공사 검사 및 부적합(NCR) 종결하기
인수 기준에 따라 공사를 검사하고, 불합격 즉시 부적합(NCR)을 제기한 뒤, 시정 조치를 진행하고 재검사하여 하자가 실제로 해결되었음을 기록으로 남깁니다.
Build a review route from a preset, dry-run it to see which role each step lands on and whether it can ever reach approved, fix what the simulation exposes, and only then put it to work.
플랫폼 전반에 걸친 4단계 - 각 단계에서 무엇을 하는지, 그리고 왜 중요한지.
Open the route library and pick the review preset closest to the flow you need rather than starting from a blank form. Adopting one clones it into a route you own and can edit; the preset itself stays read-only.
이유: Routes drawn from scratch tend to encode one person's habits and one project's politics, and they leave out the review step nobody remembers until an auditor asks. Cloning rather than editing in place also means tuning yours cannot silently move the flow every other project is already running.
Simulate the route before anything real touches it. The dry run walks the steps in order and reports, for each one, which role or named person the decision falls to, how many approvals it takes to clear, and where the whole thing ends up.
이유: A step set to all against a role with one member behaves nothing like the same step once that role has four. Reading the walk is the only way to see the real shape of a flow without discovering it on a live document in the week it matters.
Work the warnings: a quorum higher than the role can ever supply, a step that needs several approvers when only one exists, a route that never reaches approved. Then run the what-if walk, put a rejection on the step you are least sure of, and see whether the route dies there or carries on.
이유: The stuck step is the one that hurts, because nothing fails visibly. A document simply sits in review until somebody thinks to ask why, and the answer is always that the route was never walked. Finding it in a simulation costs a minute, finding it the week before a gate costs the gate.
Save the tuned route and start putting real work through it, then move off the templates tab: running and history shows every instance against the route and where each one is sitting, and the analytics show how long each step and each role is actually holding things.
이유: A route that terminates in a simulation can still take three weeks in practice, and the held time per step is the only honest read on whether the approver you picked has the capacity to be one. The same record is what proves, a year later, that the thing that got approved went through the route everybody agreed to rather than a nod in a corridor.
플랫폼 184개 모듈 중 1개
인수 기준에 따라 공사를 검사하고, 불합격 즉시 부적합(NCR)을 제기한 뒤, 시정 조치를 진행하고 재검사하여 하자가 실제로 해결되었음을 기록으로 남깁니다.
이번 근무조가 실제로 마주할 위험 요소를 브리핑하고, 참석자를 기록한 뒤, 순회 점검을 통해 합의한 통제 수단이 실제로 갖춰져 있는지 증명합니다.