케이스 / 품질 및 안전
품질 및 안전

Automate a check you keep doing by hand

Take the check you run manually every week, build it once as a pipeline from a ready-made template, lint it so nothing is quietly wired to nothing, and leave it in the library so it runs the same way every time.

4단계14 분종합건설사원가 컨설팅 / 적산 업체BIM / 디지털 컨설팅 업체

작동 방식, 단계별로

플랫폼 전반에 걸친 4단계 - 각 단계에서 무엇을 하는지, 그리고 왜 중요한지.

1

Start from a template

파이프라인 빌더

Open the pipeline builder and take the ready-made graph closest to the check you do by hand: flag positions still at zero, list the costliest items, guard a budget ceiling, or gate an export behind validation. It lands on the canvas already wired and already runnable.

이유: An empty canvas is where most automation ideas die, because the first hour goes on working out which port feeds which. Starting from a graph that runs on the first click means you begin by reading logic that works, and change it, rather than guessing at logic that does not.

입력The check you do by handTemplate gallery결과A graph that already runsNamed pipeline
2

Point it at your own data

파이프라인 빌더

Swap the template's source for your own bill, catalog or validation findings, then set the numbers that matter on this job: the ceiling the budget guard trips at, the figure a threshold gate compares against. Add a computed column, a group and total, a rename or a fan-out where the shape does not quite fit, and a non-empty guard so an empty source stops the run instead of passing it.

이유: A template carries the logic, never your project's numbers. A ceiling left at the demo figure passes everything you feed it, which is worse than having no guard at all, because the run goes green and everyone believes a check was done.

입력Template graphYour bill or catalog결과Graph bound to real dataThresholds set for this job
3

Lint it, then run it

파이프라인 빌더

Read the issue count before you press run. It flags any step whose required input has no incoming wire, and any node sitting on the canvas as an island with no wire at all. Clear those, run the pipeline, then read what each step actually did rather than just the final total.

이유: A step wired to nothing does not fail. It simply never runs, and the pipeline reports success while doing less than the canvas makes it look like it does. That is the failure worth hunting, because a green run is precisely what stops anyone looking again.

입력Wired graphRequired inputs per node결과Issue count at zeroA run with findings
4

Act on what it found

검증

Take the findings through into validation, fix the positions they point at, and save the workflow so it shows up in the picker next month instead of being rebuilt from memory.

이유: Automation only pays back on the second run. A check that lives in one person's head gets skipped the week they are on leave, and on a long job that is reliably the week it would have caught something expensive.

입력Pipeline findingsThe positions they point at결과Corrected positionsA check that now runs itself
모듈

이 플레이북의 모듈

플랫폼 184개 모듈 중 2

품질 및 안전 카테고리의 더 보기

품질 및 안전

공사 검사 및 부적합(NCR) 종결하기

인수 기준에 따라 공사를 검사하고, 불합격 즉시 부적합(NCR)을 제기한 뒤, 시정 조치를 진행하고 재검사하여 하자가 실제로 해결되었음을 기록으로 남깁니다.

3단계10 분열기
품질 및 안전

툴박스 토크 및 안전 점검

이번 근무조가 실제로 마주할 위험 요소를 브리핑하고, 참석자를 기록한 뒤, 순회 점검을 통해 합의한 통제 수단이 실제로 갖춰져 있는지 증명합니다.

2단계8 분열기
품질 및 안전

자재 제출물 승인 받기

구매하려는 제품 자료를 근거와 함께 설계자에게 제출하고, 사양서와 대조해 검토받은 후 승인된 경우에만 발주로 진행한다.

3단계9 분열기