ケース / 品質と安全
品質と安全

Automate a check you keep doing by hand

Take the check you run manually every week, build it once as a pipeline from a ready-made template, lint it so nothing is quietly wired to nothing, and leave it in the library so it runs the same way every time.

4ステップ14 分総合建設会社コストコンサルティング会社 / 積算事務所BIM / デジタルコンサルティング会社

仕組みをステップごとに

プラットフォーム全体で4ステップ - 各ステップで何をするか、そしてなぜ重要か。

1

Start from a template

パイプラインビルダー

Open the pipeline builder and take the ready-made graph closest to the check you do by hand: flag positions still at zero, list the costliest items, guard a budget ceiling, or gate an export behind validation. It lands on the canvas already wired and already runnable.

理由: An empty canvas is where most automation ideas die, because the first hour goes on working out which port feeds which. Starting from a graph that runs on the first click means you begin by reading logic that works, and change it, rather than guessing at logic that does not.

入力The check you do by handTemplate gallery出力A graph that already runsNamed pipeline
2

Point it at your own data

パイプラインビルダー

Swap the template's source for your own bill, catalog or validation findings, then set the numbers that matter on this job: the ceiling the budget guard trips at, the figure a threshold gate compares against. Add a computed column, a group and total, a rename or a fan-out where the shape does not quite fit, and a non-empty guard so an empty source stops the run instead of passing it.

理由: A template carries the logic, never your project's numbers. A ceiling left at the demo figure passes everything you feed it, which is worse than having no guard at all, because the run goes green and everyone believes a check was done.

入力Template graphYour bill or catalog出力Graph bound to real dataThresholds set for this job
3

Lint it, then run it

パイプラインビルダー

Read the issue count before you press run. It flags any step whose required input has no incoming wire, and any node sitting on the canvas as an island with no wire at all. Clear those, run the pipeline, then read what each step actually did rather than just the final total.

理由: A step wired to nothing does not fail. It simply never runs, and the pipeline reports success while doing less than the canvas makes it look like it does. That is the failure worth hunting, because a green run is precisely what stops anyone looking again.

入力Wired graphRequired inputs per node出力Issue count at zeroA run with findings
4

Act on what it found

検証

Take the findings through into validation, fix the positions they point at, and save the workflow so it shows up in the picker next month instead of being rebuilt from memory.

理由: Automation only pays back on the second run. A check that lives in one person's head gets skipped the week they are on leave, and on a long job that is reliably the week it would have caught something expensive.

入力Pipeline findingsThe positions they point at出力Corrected positionsA check that now runs itself
モジュール

このプレイブックのモジュール

プラットフォーム 184 モジュール中 2

品質と安全の他のケース

品質と安全

工事を検査し不適合を解決する

受入基準に照らして工事を検査し、不合格になった時点で不適合を起票し、是正を進めさせ、再検査を行い、不具合が確かに修正されたことを記録に残す。

3ステップ10 分開く
品質と安全

ツールボックストークと安全確認

そのシフトで実際に発生するリスクについて作業班に説明し、出席者を記録し、合意した管理策が実際に機能しているか巡回で確認する。

2ステップ8 分開く
品質と安全

材料提出書類の承認を得る

購入予定の製品をデータとともに設計者へ提示し、仕様と照合してチェックを受け、承認された時点で初めて発注へ進める。

3ステップ9 分開く