案例 / 质量与安全
质量与安全

Automate a check you keep doing by hand

Take the check you run manually every week, build it once as a pipeline from a ready-made template, lint it so nothing is quietly wired to nothing, and leave it in the library so it runs the same way every time.

4 个步骤14 分钟总承包商造价咨询 / 工料测量顾问BIM/数字化顾问公司

运作方式,逐步说明

贯穿平台的 4 个步骤 - 每一步做什么,以及为什么重要。

1

Start from a template

流水线构建器

Open the pipeline builder and take the ready-made graph closest to the check you do by hand: flag positions still at zero, list the costliest items, guard a budget ceiling, or gate an export behind validation. It lands on the canvas already wired and already runnable.

原因: An empty canvas is where most automation ideas die, because the first hour goes on working out which port feeds which. Starting from a graph that runs on the first click means you begin by reading logic that works, and change it, rather than guessing at logic that does not.

输入The check you do by handTemplate gallery成果A graph that already runsNamed pipeline
2

Point it at your own data

流水线构建器

Swap the template's source for your own bill, catalog or validation findings, then set the numbers that matter on this job: the ceiling the budget guard trips at, the figure a threshold gate compares against. Add a computed column, a group and total, a rename or a fan-out where the shape does not quite fit, and a non-empty guard so an empty source stops the run instead of passing it.

原因: A template carries the logic, never your project's numbers. A ceiling left at the demo figure passes everything you feed it, which is worse than having no guard at all, because the run goes green and everyone believes a check was done.

输入Template graphYour bill or catalog成果Graph bound to real dataThresholds set for this job
3

Lint it, then run it

流水线构建器

Read the issue count before you press run. It flags any step whose required input has no incoming wire, and any node sitting on the canvas as an island with no wire at all. Clear those, run the pipeline, then read what each step actually did rather than just the final total.

原因: A step wired to nothing does not fail. It simply never runs, and the pipeline reports success while doing less than the canvas makes it look like it does. That is the failure worth hunting, because a green run is precisely what stops anyone looking again.

输入Wired graphRequired inputs per node成果Issue count at zeroA run with findings
4

Act on what it found

验证

Take the findings through into validation, fix the positions they point at, and save the workflow so it shows up in the picker next month instead of being rebuilt from memory.

原因: Automation only pays back on the second run. A check that lives in one person's head gets skipped the week they are on leave, and on a long job that is reliably the week it would have caught something expensive.

输入Pipeline findingsThe positions they point at成果Corrected positionsA check that now runs itself
模块

此方案使用的模块

184 个平台模块中的 2

更多 质量与安全 案例

质量与安全

检查工程并关闭不符合项

依据验收标准检查工程,一旦不合格立即提出不符合项,推动整改并复检,使记录能证明缺陷已确实修复。

3 个步骤10 分钟打开
质量与安全

安全讲话与安全检查

向班组说明本班次实际存在的隐患,记录出勤人员,然后在巡查中验证约定的管控措施是否真正落实。

2 个步骤8 分钟打开
质量与安全

获取材料报审批准

将拟采购的产品连同技术资料提交设计方审核,对照技术规格进行核查,获批后再放行下单。

3 个步骤9 分钟打开