打开演示
案例 / 估算与成本
估算与成本

Value engineer a design to the target cost

Bring an over-budget design back to target without gutting it: find the costliest elements in the bill, test cheaper options for their value, and report the savings you can defend.

3 个步骤10 分钟造价咨询 / 工料测量师总承包商开发商/业主

运作方式,逐步说明

贯穿平台的 3 个步骤 - 每一步做什么,以及为什么重要。

1

Find where the money sits

工程量清单

Sort the priced bill to see which elements carry the cost and how far the total sits above the target, so the value-engineering effort goes where the money actually is.

原因: Chasing pennies across cheap lines while the expensive elements go untouched is wasted effort. Finding the hotspots first is what points value engineering at the few changes that can actually close the gap.

输入Priced BOQCost target成果Cost hotspotsSavings gap
2

Test the options for value

已实现价值

For each hotspot, test the cheaper alternatives, weigh what each one saves against what it costs the scheme in quality, programme or running cost, and keep the ones that pay their way.

原因: A saving that wrecks the maintenance cost or the look of the building is not a saving. Scoring options on value, not just first cost, is what stops value engineering turning into value destruction.

输入Cost hotspotsAlternative specs成果Scored optionsRecommended changes
3

Report the defensible savings

报告

Report the changes you recommend with the saving and the trade-off spelled out for each, and show the revised total against target, so the client decides on evidence rather than a bare number.

原因: A savings list with no trade-offs shown is one the client cannot make a real decision on. Laying out what each change costs as well as saves is what gets value engineering approved instead of argued over.

输入Recommended changesCost target成果Value engineering reportRevised cost plan

更多 估算与成本 案例